Sorel Men’s 1964 Pac T Winter Boot
- Minus 40 degree rated
- Removable 9MM Thermo Plus felt Innerboot
- Waterproof full grained embossed leather uppe
- Handcrafted waterproof vulcanized rubber shell
Product DescriptionPull out the ol’ flares and flannel as Sorel brings back the old-school with the retro-style Men’s 1964 Pac T Boot. You might not have the same back as you did when you were 16, but at least now you can afford nice boots with waterproof leather and sealed seams, so they actually work in harsh conditions. Those were good times, but hell, you wouldn’t want to go back after you’ve experienced the ultra-warm felt Innerboot insulation in the 1964s. You’ve aged with grace. . . More >>
5 Comments
Other Links to this Post
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
By George Spakowski, February 21, 2010 @ 11:07 pm
One of the boots are great the other one makes a sore on the back of your foot. More junk from China.
Rating: 3 / 5
By Richard C. Schott, February 22, 2010 @ 1:01 am
I normally wear a 13 wide, found a pair of these on the clearance rack in a 14, tried them on for giggles and they actually fit well.
I agree with others who have stated that they are comfortable like slippers but not especially supportive. Better for milling around camp than hiking.
I’ve used them on camping trips down to -15F with no issues. I was probably wearing a single pair of good wool socks with them. I haven’t had an opportunity to test them down to the rated temperature but I have no reason to think they wouldn’t do ok. It depends on so many other factors anyways, activity levels, what else you’re wearing, your own metabolism and circulation etc.
Anyways I like the boots, they are easy to get into, easy to lace up with gloves on, and I feel like I’m prepared for any cold I might experience anywhere in NY where I live. They are overkill almost all the time downstate, but in the Adirondacks they’re just what the doctor ordered. . .
Rating: 5 / 5
By A. Aubinoe, February 22, 2010 @ 2:22 am
This is a great deal for a leather waterproof boot. My only disappointment is that a boot like this is made in China. Im a size 9, but I ordered a size 10 so I could slip the boots on and grow into them. I am glad I ordered them big. If I tighten the laces they are snug. These boots have that great L. L. Bean look. I got them free shipping from Moosjaw. this is a comparable price on amazon, but moosjaw happened to have an additional 25% off eal at the time. The caribu boot looks almost thesame besides the white fur. this boot is not to good for hiking, but is great for walking of shoveling in the snow. the rubber base is tuff, but the tread is minimal.
Rating: 5 / 5
By Irene Cole, February 22, 2010 @ 3:52 am
This is very sturdy and warm boot. It cost alot but it is worth it in the years it will last. My son-in-law had a previous pair and wore them out finally. He is very happy with these boots.
Rating: 5 / 5
By T. Fiero, February 22, 2010 @ 5:33 am
For casual winter use, this old style pac boot design is hard to beat. It’s easy to see why they’re a popular seller. They feel like a pair of waterproof, insulated snow slippers–they don’t provide much cushioning or support, but give your feet the freedom they crave–especially if you have wide feet like mine.
A potentially misleading description in the “Product Features” is that they’re described as having “full grain embossed” leather uppers. According to the International Union of Leather Technologists and Chemists Societies web site, full grain leather means “Leather bearing the original grain surface as exposed by removal of the epidermis and with none of the surface removed by buffing, snuffing or splitting. ”
They don’t mean full grain, embossed leather. It would be more accurately described as light weight leather that has been embossed to simulate the appearance of full grain leather.
Pros:
1. Light weight, warm, waterproof
2. Amost as comfortable as a pair of slippers
3. The wide toebox accomodates wide feet
3. Low profile “herringbone” tread is great for snowshoeing and doesn’t accumulate snow
4. Well stitched (at least my pair was)
Cons:
1. Compared to my old Sorels, the toe box has a slightly lower “ceiling,” which results in a more snug fit and makes it difficult to reinsert the felt liner–at least when the boots are new. This is probably a minor point.
2. The boots don’t provide much cushioning or foot support, and so may not be suitable for extended use for people who need extra support.
3. The flap/loop that holds the bottom of the bootlace will trap snow and moisture, providing an entry point for moisture once the waterproofing breaks down. This is a design flaw.
4. The rubber bottoms are susceptible to punctures and will not be as durable as some winter boots. This is the tradeoff you get for comfort and flexibility.
Overall, this is a good light use snow boot (although some people wear them all day long). They work well with snowshoes and are suitable for light winter hiking, running errands, working in the yard, etc. Due to their lack of support and cushioning and low breathability, they are less suitable for extended use or hiking on bare ground.
Notes:
My pair was true to size. I wear a 10 1/2 EE but the 11D’s fit well.
The -40F rating is optimistic for long term exposure. These aren’t expedition boots.
Rating: 4 / 5